Newman as a young man |
A sample:
"It was the late Fr
Calmel OP who warned us against papolatry – a frame of mind, alas,
which has blinded many to the defects not only of the longer serving
conciliar and post conciliar Popes of Vatican II, but also to the
fruits of their labour, the conciliar revolution, which one suspects is
soon to be canonised along with both John XXIII and John Paul II.
Newman reminds us that defects were not
lacking in the Apostles too. He recalls that Our Lord chose His
Apostles from a cross-section of society - from the humble fisherman to
the tax collector and that He worked with the metal He had at hand.
Newman notes:‘The especial grace poured upon the Apostles and
their associates, whether miraculous or moral, had no tendency to
destroy their respective peculiarities of temper and character, to
invest them with a sanctity beyond our imitation, or to preclude
failings and errors, which may be our warning.’
One can easily believe this in respect of
Judas’s failings and fatal errors, but also concerning Peter too whose
thrice denial of Our Lord evokes emotions in all of us who have
betrayed Our Lord in our sinful lives. But it was Peter also who was
the subject of Our Lord’s harshest rebuke: ‘Get thou behind me, Satan’ – a reminder that the Apostle chosen by Our Lord to head His Church could stray from a correct reading of his Master’s mind.
The Holy Father’s recent comments regarding
“triumphalism” have been taken by some traditionalists to apply to
traditionalists alone, while others consider that, on the contrary they
apply to progressives. In view of more recent comments, we suspect the
former – a view which seems to be endorsed by progressives themselves.
The initial confusion arose from the word “triumphalism” which was
used in the conciliar era by progressives as a nasty swearword,
comparable in effect to the word integriste, to denigrate all
that the pre-conciliar Church stood for. In the political arena it has a
like term “fascist” which was a socialist swearword to attack any
political opinion to the right of Marx, Lenin or Trotsky. If one uses
these words today one can expect to be misunderstood. But just as the
grace given to the Apostles did not preclude their failings and
errors, these too are not precluded in pontiffs. One should always bear
that in mind especially when a pontiff’s opinion or asides bear none of
the hallmarks of pontifical authority.
Failings – A Warning
Newman advises us that these failings of the Apostles serve to provide us with a warning: ‘Moreover,
the definiteness and evident truth of many of the pictures presented
to us in the Gospels serve to realize to us the history, and to help
our faith, while at the same time they afford us abundant instruction.
Such, for instance, is the immature ardour of James and John, the
sudden fall of Peter, the obstinacy of Thomas, and the cowardice of
Mark. St. Barnabas furnishes us with a lesson in his own way; nor shall
I be wanting in piety towards that Holy Apostle, if on this his day I
hold him forth, not only in the peculiar graces of his character, but in
those parts of it in which he becomes our warning, not our example.’
Read the rest over at the Apropos Editor's Blog page.
No comments:
Post a Comment